|
Similarly,
we understand how the light elements
such as helium were made in a process
known as Big Bang nucleosynthesis, but
what about heavy elements such as
uranium or thorium? It is possible
that they were produced in cataclysmic
explosions of stars called supernovae
that emitted most of their energy in
neutrinos. If so, what can neutrinos
tell us about these explosions
occurred and the corresponding
production of elements?
Finally,
cosmic microwave background (CMB),
large scale structure, and other
cosmological observations have taught
us that the state of the universe long
before the time of Big Bang
nucleosynthesis is consistent with a
relatively elegant paradigm of
cosmological initial conditions called
the inflationary paradigm, but we have
yet to identify which field is
responsible for inflation and what the
detailed dynamics of such a field is.
Is it slow roll inflation? What can
the possible CMB imprint of quantum
gravitational fluctuations during
inflation tell us about the light
field degrees of freedom existing
during inflation? Which models of
inflation can generate large non-Guassian
perturbations possibly measurable by
future experiments? Are there
signatures of string theory in
inflationary observables? Are there
equally appealing alternatives to
inflation?
In
short, our research can be summarized
as addressing a number of unanswered
questions about the universe:
-
Why
is there more baryon than
anti-baryon in the present
universe?
-
What
are the unseen forces present at
the birth of the cosmos that
disappeared from view as it
evolved?
-
What
are the properties of neutrinos
and how have they shaped the
evolution of the cosmos?
-
What
causes stars to explode and how
were the heavy elements made? What
is the nature of dark matter and
dark energy?
-
Can
alternative theories of gravity
solve these problems and perhaps
even the generic singularities
existing in general
relativity?
-
What
is the inflaton, and what are all
the physical probes of its
properties? Why is the observed
cosmological constant small when
SM says it should be big?
A
more detailed discussion of some of
our research related to these
questions can be found in the
following links:
Electroweak
baryogenesis and the origin of
matter
Physics
beyond the Standard Model:
Supersymmetry,
Grand Unification, and Extra
Dimensions
Neutrino
Properties and Interactions
Neutrino
Astrophysics
Electroweak
Symmetry-breaking: the Higgs Boson
and its Cousins
Fundamental
Symmetries in Nuclei
Related
Areas: In addition to pursuing
answers to these questions, NPAC
theorists also seek to explain how the
properties of protons, neutrons, and
atomic nuclei emerge from the strong
interaction as described by Quantum
Chromodynamics (QCD). Doing so is
important both as a scientific quest
in its own right as well as a
prerequisite for interpreting the
results of low-energy searches for new
forces. Many of these exquisitely
precise experiments involve strongly
interacting systems, such as the
neutron, treating them effectively as
femtoscale “laboratories” for
fundamental interaction studies. As
with any other laboratory, it is
essential to understand all the quirks
of these femtoscale laboratories in
order to interpret properly
experimental results. More details on
our research related to these areas
can be found at:
Twisting the Proton
in Quantum Chromodynamics:
Effective
Field Theories
Research
Support and Synergies: External
NPAC research support is provided by
the Nuclear Physics and High Energy
Programs of the U.S. Department of
Energy Office of Science as well as
the National Science Foundation.
Additional external support is
provided through a cooperative
research agreements with Oak Ridge
National Laboratory and Turkish
Scientific and Technical Research
Council.
The
Department of Energy's Office of
Science-NP and National Science
Foundation supported effort seeks to
provide theoretical guidance to the
“New Standard Model Initiative”
(NSMI) in nuclear physics, recently
identified as one of the top
priorities in the 2007 Nuclear
Science Advisory Committee Long
Range Plan. The NSMI aims to exploit
unique nuclear physics capabilities to
discover key ingredients of what will
be the “new” Standard Model of
fundamental interactions. The
experiments encompassed by the NSMI
are complementary to those at the
Tevatron and LHC, and will be carried
out at a variety of facilities: the
Spallation Neutron Source at Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Jefferson
National Accelerator Facility,
Brookhaven National Laboratory,
Argonne National Laboratory, Los
Alamos National Laboratory, and the
future Deep Underground Science and
Engineering Laboratory planned for the
Homestake Mine. NPAC theorists are
providing key theoretical leadership
for the NSMI.
|