[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: contour fill

Subject: Re: contour fill
From: davidf(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 18:38:40 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
References: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000825135236.9631C-100000@prasanta> <MPG.141026e67ef4c9b1989bf5@news.frii.com> <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000825161349.9631G-100000@prasanta> <MPG.141048d6778262fa989bf7@news.frii.com> <onu2c9rslu.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu> <MPG.1410942c86ec260f989bfd@news.frii.com> <on1yzbbmw2.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:21095

Craig Markwardt (craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu) writes:

> You wondered why a basic threshold wouldn't work.  I think his reply
> was that he wanted to select a *particular* contour.  When there are
> several peaks in the data then a simple threshold will not work.  As I
> pointed out the hardest part in the algorithm I gave is selecting the
> right contour.  [And I gave a posible heuristic to decide.]

Oh, I liked your answer well enough. (I always do.)
But I'm leery of the right answer to the wrong
question. I guess that translates to Why?.

How's it going on those other IDL questions I posed? :-)

Cheers,

David

-- 
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

References:
- contour fill
  - From: Stephen O'Sullivan
- Re: contour fill
  - From: David Fanning
- Re: contour fill
  - From: Stephen O'Sullivan
- Re: contour fill
  - From: David Fanning
- Re: contour fill
  - From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: contour fill
  - From: David Fanning
- Re: contour fill
  - From: Craig Markwardt

Prev by Date: Re: contour fill
Next by Date: Re: Keyword precedence
Prev by thread: Re: contour fill
Next by thread: Re: contour fill
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread