[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gridding options

Subject: Re: Gridding options
From: Ben Tupper <btupper(at)bigelow.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 08:21:14 -0600
Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
Organization: Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Science
References: <39ABD2A0.D7A3C749@bigelow.org> <on8ztfj3el.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu> <39AC2DAB.99ED6D48@bigelow.org> <on66ojiu8f.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu>
Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:21171



Craig Markwardt wrote:

>
> The more appropriate question is probably, how broad should the
> gaussian be in X and Y?  This depends on how much smoothing you want
> to acomplish, and the new sampling.  For example, if your original
> sampling was 10-20 km, then the interpolated image might have ~2 km
> resolution.  With minimal smoothing, the gaussian sigma would be
> around 15 km (ie, comparable to your sampling).  The response function
> should have around +/- 2 sigmas = +/- 30 km, which is about 30 pixels.
>

Ah!  Got it!

THANKS!

Ben

--
Ben Tupper
Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Science
West Boothbay Harbor, Maine
btupper@bigelow.org
     note: email address new as of 25JULY2000

References:
- Gridding options
  - From: Ben Tupper
- Re: Gridding options
  - From: Craig Markwardt
- Re: Gridding options
  - From: Craig Markwardt

Prev by Date: Re: filled contours with POLYFILL
Next by Date: Re: opening and display large file
Prev by thread: Re: Gridding options
Next by thread: Re: Gridding options
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread