Research, teaching and outreach in Physics at UW–Madison
saperdue@wisc.edu
Mark Saffman wins Bell Prize
Posted on
This post is derived from content originally published by the University of Toronto
Mark Saffman
Congrats to Mark Saffman, the Johannes Rydberg Professor of Physics and director of the Wisconsin Quantum Institute, on earning the ninth Biennial John Stewart Bell Prize for Research on Fundamental Issues in Quantum Mechanics and Their Applications.
He shares the prize with Antoine Browaeys (CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay) and Mikhail Lukin (Harvard) for their pioneering contributions to quantum simulation and quantum computing with neutral atoms in optical tweezer arrays, including the development of large-scale programmable arrays for scalable quantum computation. The prize will be given at the eleventh international conference on Quantum Information and Quantum Control, University of Toronto.
Saffman’s career-spanning work was also recognized last month with the American Physical Society’s Ramsey Prize in AMO Physics and in Precision Tests of Fundamental Laws and Symmetries, a prize he shares with Browaeys.
The John Stewart Bell Prize for Research on Fundamental Issues in Quantum Mechanics and their Applications (short form: “Bell Prize”) was established in 2009, and is awarded every other year, for significant contributions first published in the preceding 6 years. The award is meant to recognize major advances relating to the foundations of quantum mechanics and to the applications of these principles – this covers, but is not limited to, quantum information theory, quantum computation, quantum foundations, quantum cryptography, and quantum control. The award is not intended as a “lifetime achievement” award, but rather to highlight the continuing rapid pace of research in these areas, and the fruitful interplay of fundamental research and potential applications. It is intended to cover even-handedly both of these aspects, and to include both theoretical and experimental contributions.
Francis Halzen wins 2026 APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research
Game on! New course explores the physics of sports
Posted on
By Francesca Smith, physics communications intern
Students who signed up for a course about the physics of sports probably did not expect to take a field trip to the Kohler Art Library at the beginning of the semester. But the unexpected is the norm with Jim Reardon, the instructor for Physics 106: Physics of Sports. While many science courses on campus consist largely of memorizing equations and staying ahead of the class curve, Reardon takes a multifaceted, participatory approach to teaching his students.
“You’re trying to put on a show that grabs their attention and effortlessly keeps it because you’re presenting a spectacle, like a movie,” Reardon says. “You don’t have to force yourself to pay attention to something that’s inherently interesting, it just sort of naturally goes there.”
“Abe Eddington at the trot” is the first sports movie ever made. Eadweard Muybridge pioneered a method of showing images using a zoopraxiscope. This animated GIF, compiled by Jim Reardon from Library of Congress images, helps to recreate the movie.
At the library, Reardon has students flip through a first-edition copy of Eadweard Muybridge’s Animal Locomotion from 1887, which shows phases of movement through photo sequences. Motion — so fundamental a concept to physics that Isaac Newton developed a set of laws around it — is commonly taught using a quantitative approach. Reardon uses Muybridge’s images to illustrate the concept of motion in a more intuitive way.
Reardon first developed Physics 106 with the help of fellow UW–Madison physics professor Cary Forest. The two were inspired by a similar course taught by one of Forest’s colleagues at UC Irvine, which was a favorite among students there. Physics of Sports was first taught at UW–Madison in Spring 2023, and initially resulted in 36 student enrollments. Now, three years later, course registration numbers have skyrocketed to approximately 300 undergraduates.
While the course’s theme attracts sports fans, Reardon’s unique methods of teaching also resonate with students, especially those intimidated by the idea of taking a college-level physics course. He follows a hands-on approach to teaching, where students are encouraged to, for example, run and jump in front of the classroom to demonstrate momentum. Field trips such as the aforementioned visit to the Kohler Art Library are also common in the course. Reardon used to work with The Wonders of Physics — the physics department’s educational outreach program — and noticed how audiences responded better to participation compared to lectures alone.
A fire tornado shows the link between oxygen consumption and energy burned as exercise intensity increases.
The course model also emphasizes lots of extra credit opportunities, which offer students a chance to improve their grades through additional work. If a student performs poorly on an exam, for instance, they then have the option to redeem their grade on the exam by demonstrating mastery of concepts they missed. In that sense, Reardon also uses Physics 106 to broaden the traditional standards of technical education. He points out that it’s as if students, when they were young, were divided into black-and-white categories of “good” and “bad” at math, which affects the confidence and success of students later on.
“And then we, at the college level, have to deal with that,” Reardon says. “Many of them I think would be quite successful, if they only didn’t have these mental blocks left from earlier.”
By utilizing a topic — sports such as baseball, basketball, football and more — that students find engaging, he can use this initial interest to help teach them about fundamental physics concepts such as impulse and energy. In that sense, Reardon seems to be his own kind of coach for the students in Physics 106: Physics of Sports. He considers an individual student’s success a team win, through a joint effort on their end and his.
“If I’m engaged to teach these students physics, then they’re going to get taught physics,” Reardon says. “So it takes a lot of extra work for me, but I do feel that there are a lot of gains to be made, too.”
Top photo: Everyone is an expert in torque even if they don’t know it yet, says Jim Reardon. Reardon (right, with teaching specialist Mitch McNanna PhD’23), uses familiar concepts — like a seesaw that most students played on at some point in their childhood — to illustrate physics topics such as torque.
Uwe Bergmann in Symmetry article on using photons to observe nature
Physics-informed Neural Networks Enable High-Fidelity Quantum Gate Design Using Optimal Control
Researchers successfully employ physics-informed neural networks to design high-fidelity pulses for controlling quantum operations, demonstrating a flexible and robust method for optimising two-qubit gate performance.
Joshua Foster’s long-standing interest in computational tools is, he believes, what led him to research a range of theoretical physics, including dark matter, gravitational waves, and new physics. “What got me interested in studying theoretical physics in particular was the idea that you could study structures or ways of doing calculations that would enable you to make predictions or derive results that just wouldn’t have been possible with previous approaches,” he says.
Foster, who referred to himself “extremely Midwestern,” grew up in Indianapolis, attended Indiana University as an undergraduate, and the University of Michigan for his PhD. He joined MIT as a Pappalardo Fellow in the Center for Theoretical Physics, then Fermilab as a Schramm Fellow in Theoretical Astrophysics. In August 2025, he joined the UW–Madison physics faculty.
Please give an overview of your research.
I’m generally interested in problems that surround: 1) the optimal design of an astrophysical observation or a laboratory-based experiment, 2) serious phenomenological calculations that give us a good understanding of what a signal of new physics might look like, and 3) the application of statistics and data analysis to determine if new physics signals were hiding in data that was accessible to us all along.
My primary interest, at least historically, has been in dark matter. At present, all we can really say is that 85 percent of the matter of our universe is yet to be identified, so it seems like a rather urgent problem to understand what that is. It also seems to be one of the few unambiguous hints of new Physics. My research is generally focused on what often is referred to as indirect and direct detection. The idea behind indirect detection — meaning that dark matter or other signals of new physics might appear to us in astrophysical datasets — is that although it might be challenging directly observe dark matter or new physics phenomena, we might be able to observe its downstream effects in astrophysical contexts. For example, dark matter could be made up of particles that annihilate when they encounter one another, and doing so produces gamma-ray signals. Or, dark matter could convert to photons in extreme astrophysical environments, producing radio signals. I’ve been thinking a lot about how to perform optimal searches in radio data in the search of that data. Another possibility is, we say, okay, these systems are interesting but complicated and intrinsically messy. Then we might alternatively look for dark matter interactions with precision laboratory systems. That’s the two-pronged big picture: looking for new physics in astrophysical observables and looking for physics in laboratory-based searches.
Then lately I’ve been thinking quite a bit about gravitational waves, which I find exciting because they might let us probe the mysterious early universe. We typically look back in time by looking at photons that are coming to us from a very, very long time ago. There’s a certain time we can’t look past, which is when the universe was too opaque to photons, but gravitational waves should have freely propagated through the universe, providing us with a way of looking even further back in time. It might be our best chance at understanding the physics of the very highest scales that would have been active in the early universe.
What are the first one or two projects your new group will work on here?
A major focus of my research going forward will be on detection strategies for gravitational waves. One exciting possibility that I’ve been studying recently is that the roughly 60 years of lunar laser ranging data — high precision measurements of the Earth-Moon distance — could be used to detect gravitational wave backgrounds at frequencies that have been challenging to access by other technologies. In tandem, it’s nice to understand what the new physics theories are that can generate gravitational wave signals, either at the frequencies that we can access with lunar laser ranging or at the frequencies that are being accessed currently by, for example, pulsar timing arrays, but might also be accessed in the future by the upcoming LISA observatory. And so really understanding how to make optimal use of the data that these observatories are collecting and how to connect them with new ideas for how models of new physics can generate gravitational wave observations is something that I plan to focus on.
In conjunction, I am looking for radio signals of axions, which convert to photons in the strong magnetic fields which surround neutron stars. The facilities and technologies through which we can perform radio observations are constantly being improved and eventually are going to culminate in two upcoming observatories: DSA-2000 and the Square Kilometer Array. As we prepare for these upcoming facilities, there are both prototypes and pathfinder observatories that are collecting data right now. So I’m interested in using those existing datasets to, first off, perform searches that are already going to have reach unparalleled by any others, and to set the stage for future data collections and analysis efforts with these upgraded facilities.
What attracted you to Madison and the university?
Well, having begun this conversation by saying I’m very Midwest—I wanted to come back to the Midwest. And the department here has people with a broad set of expertise in many different technical fields that are all of interest to me. For example, in these contexts where I’m thinking about axion-photon interactions around neutron stars, the great challenge is understanding this complicated astrophysical environment. Here, there are experts in plasma physics, and there’s WIPAC, which is this incredible particle astrophysics center. The connections across campus in terms of the emerging data science focus also made me feel like this was a place where I would have colleagues with strong overlapping interests.
What is your favorite element and/or elementary particle?
I like helium. We can use helium-3 and helium-4 to make things very, very cold, and many of the experiments that I like to think about require extraordinarily cold systems to minimize thermal noise. They are only possible thanks to dilution refrigerators that pump helium in a manner that allows it to reach temperatures as low as 10 millikelvin. And Helium-3 has a number of other, to my mind at least, magic quantum properties. The number of interesting things that you can do with helium-3 seems to be limited only by your imagination.
My favorite particle is the axion. It’s my favorite dark matter candidate. And it might not exist in nature, but it is my favorite hypothetical particle. I hope it exists and that we find it.
What hobbies and interests do you have?
Cooking is my primary hobby. I like to eat—that’s part of it. But one of the joys of cooking is that you get to spend time on a craft. You can develop a skill and expertise, and you can measure your progress over time, and at the end of it, you eat the thing that you made, and then move forward with your life unburdened by your act of creation. So it’s also very low stakes. Other than cooking, I like to hike and I like to read.
2025 Nobel Prize Laureate John Martinis’s Connections to UW–Madison
Posted on
UW–Madison builds on partnerships at Chicago Quantum Summit
The eighth-annual Chicago Quantum Summit was held Nov. 3-4, 2025 convening more than 500 top industry, government, and academic leaders from around the world for dialogue aimed at shaping the future of quantum technology. Held in downtown Chicago, at the center of the globally recognized Illinois-Wisconsin-Indiana quantum hub, the two-day event highlighted breakthrough research, commercialization […]
